MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128952174 · doi:10.1109/cdc.1992.371096

On computing the eigenvalues of a symplectic pencil

2005· article· en· W2128952174 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPencil (optics)Symplectic geometryEigenvalues and eigenvectorsMatrix pencilAlgebraic numberMathematicsAlgebra over a fieldAlgebraic Riccati equationSymplectic matrixApplied mathematicsPure mathematicsComputer scienceSymplectic representationRiccati equationMathematical analysisSymplectic manifoldDifferential equationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author presents an algorithm for computing the eigenvalues of a symplectic pencil that arises in one of the commonly used approaches for solving the discrete-time algebraic Riccati equation. The algorithm is numerically efficient and reliable in that it employs only orthogonal transformations and makes use of the structure of the symplectic pencil. It requires about one-fourth the number of floating point operations that the QZ algorithm uses to compute the eigenvalues of the pencil directly. The proposed method can be regarded as being analogous for the case of symplectic pencils to the method developed by C. Van Loan (1984) for computing the eigenvalues of Hamiltonian matrices.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207