MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129187957 · doi:10.1002/hed.1049

Quality of life and oral function in patients treated with radiation therapy for head and neck cancer

2001· article· en· W2129187957 on OpenAlexaff
Joel B. Epstein, Manuella Robertson, Sue Emerton, Norm Phillips, Peter Stevenson‐Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueHead & Neck · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOral health in cancer treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver General HospitalBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead and neck cancerRadiation therapyMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Head and neckCancerOncologyRadiologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Multiple oral complaints develop during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, and quality of life is affected after treatment. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the quality of life, oral function, and oral symptoms in a cohort of patients during and after radiation therapy. METHODS: A general quality of life survey (the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), with an added oral symptom and function scale was administered to a consecutive series of patients who received radiation therapy for head and neck malignant disease. Patients completed surveys at the beginning of radiation therapy, immediately after, and 6 months after treatment. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The questionnaire used in this study provides increased information regarding the oral and dental function that is frequently affected by radiation therapy. Results of this study indicate the need to determine oral dysfunction after head and neck cancer therapy, so that the most predictable cure or best palliation of the malignancy with the least impact on oral function and quality of life is chosen. Oral complications during and after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer are common and affect quality of life. Oral QOL does not return to pretreatment levels by 6 months after radiation therapy. This study supports the use of a general function scale such as the EORTC questionnaire with the addition of disease/site-specific scales to provide data on outcomes of therapy and on the complications associated with therapy. The EORTC QLQ 30 questionnaire with the oral assessment addendum provides a measure of the quality of life and oral function in head and neck cancer patients and may provide useful outcome measures for assessment of oral care prevention and management strategies in these patient populations. The results show that the questionnaire is responsive to change throughout the course of radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations285
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHead & NeckSame topicOral health in cancer treatmentFrench-language works237,207