Robust and Objective Decomposition and Mapping of Bifurcating Vessels
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Other designConsensus signal: none
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: none
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.966
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.322
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Computational modeling of human arteries has been broadly employed to investigate the relationships between geometry, hemodynamics and vascular disease. Recent developments in modeling techniques have made it possible to perform such analyses on realistic geometries acquired noninvasively and, thus, have opened up the possibility to extend the investigation to populations of subjects. However, for this to be feasible, novel methods for the comparison of the data obtained from large numbers of realistic models in the presence of anatomic variability must be developed. In this paper, we present an automatic technique for the objective comparison of distributions of geometric and hemodynamic quantities over the surface of bifurcating vessels. The method is based on centerlines and consists of robustly decomposing the surface into its constituent branches and mapping each branch onto a template parametric plane. The application of the technique to realistic data demonstrates how similar results are obtained over similar geometries, allowing for proper model-to-model comparison. Thanks to the computational and differential geometry criteria adopted, the method does not depend on user-defined parameters or user interaction, it is flexible with respect to the bifurcation geometry and it is readily extendible to more complex configurations of interconnecting vessels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Topic
- Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- Western University
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- BifurcationParametric statisticsComputer scienceComputational geometrySurface (topology)GeometryAlgorithmParametric surfaceParametric modelPlane (geometry)MathematicsNonlinear systemPhysics
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes