MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129356153 · doi:10.1109/psce.2011.5772476

Power flow analysis in multi-terminal HVDC grid

2011· article· en· W2129356153 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsController (irrigation)GridVoltageControl theory (sociology)Computer sciencePower (physics)Electric power systemLine (geometry)Terminal (telecommunication)Power flowElectrical engineeringEngineeringControl (management)PhysicsTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent interests in developing a new type of grid have suggested the idea of the dc grid. However, the dc grid has less degrees of freedom than an ac grid which restricts its power flow control ability. To overcome this situation, an auxiliary dc voltage controller that would vary the voltage on a dc line can be inserted to provide additional degrees of control freedom. This paper investigates the benefits of adding such controller on a dc grid. The region of operation for a system with and without the auxiliary dc voltage controller is calculated. Two configurations are studied: a 3 terminals system with 3 lines and a 4 terminals system with 5 lines. The analysis confirms the enlargement of the region of operation for both systems and high sensitivity to voltage variations caused by the controller is explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207