Transmission delay in wireless sensing, command and control applications for aircraft
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless sensing, command, control and prognostics health monitoring (PHM) solutions provide the promise of ease of system maintenance and upgrade, reduced life-cycle cost and could significantly improve system safety, security and overall comfort On the contrary, utilizing wireless connectivity introduces a number of challenges such as resilience against anti jamming and interference avoidance. In this paper, we particularly discuss the problem of varying time delays for a wireless link. An exemplary application is elaborated as case study for wireless transmission of PHM for a more-electric aircraft (MEA) where transmission delay has to be extremely small. The discussion is continued with some delay measurements to highlight the current limitation of some of the existing wireless solutions. It is concluded that existing commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) wireless solutions are not suitable for direct use in this type of applications, and specialized solutions need to be developed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it