MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129551233 · doi:10.1109/mvt.2006.307296

Effective interference control in ultra-wideband wireless networks

2006· article· en· W2129551233 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltra-Wideband Communications Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipath propagationComputer networkRadio resource managementComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Power controlWirelessWireless networkFadingUltra-widebandPhysical layerInterference (communication)Electronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)EngineeringTelecommunicationsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultra-wideband (UWB) technology is a viable candidate for next generation wireless communications, with merits such as high data rate, low power, robustness to multipath fading, and positioning capability. Multiple nearby transmissions can be supported in UWB networks, using an appropriate code assignment mechanism. Different from cellular networks, the near-far problem in UWB networks cannot be solved solely by power control at the physical layer. Instead, it should be managed jointly with: the radio resource allocation at the link layer in order to: achieve interference control. This article reviews possible solutions for distributed code assignment in UWB networks, and investigates two effective approaches, namely spatial exclusion and temporal exclusion, for interference control in UWB networks

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it