MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129564949 · doi:10.1002/ange.201001273

Nanocellulosen: eine neue Familie naturbasierter Materialien

2011· article· de· W2129564949 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2011
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanocelluloseChemistryCellulosePolymer sciencePolymer chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cellulosefibrillen und ‐kristalle mit einem Durchmesser im Nanometerbereich sind naturbasierte Materialien mit einzigartigen und potenziell wertvollen Eigenschaften. Vor allem eröffnen diese neuartigen Nanocellulosen dem natürlichen Polymer Cellulose die stark expandierenden Einsatzgebiete nachhaltige Materialien, Nanokomposite sowie Produkte für die Medizin und die Lebenswissenschaften. Die Nanodimensionen der Strukturelemente führen zu großen Oberflächen und damit zu starken Wechselwirkungen dieser Cellulosen mit umgebenden Stoffen wie Wasser, anorganischen, organischen und polymeren Verbindungen, Nanopartikeln und lebenden Zellen. Diese Übersicht bietet das aktuelle Wissen über die Isolierung mikrofibrillierter Cellulose aus Holz und ihre Anwendung in Nanokompositen, die Herstellung nanokristalliner Cellulose und ihren Einsatz als Verstärkungsmaterial sowie die biotechnologische Erzeugung bakterieller Nanocellulose einschließlich ihrer Eignung als Biomaterial für medizinische Implantate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it