THE GEOMETRY OF QUADRATIC POLYNOMIAL DIFFERENTIAL SYSTEMS WITH A WEAK FOCUS AND AN INVARIANT STRAIGHT LINE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Planar quadratic differential systems occur in many areas of applied mathematics. Although more than a thousand papers were written on these systems, a complete understanding of this family is still missing. Classical problems, and in particular, Hilbert's 16th problem [Hilbert, 1900, 1902], are still open for this family. In this article, we conduct a global study of the class QWI of all real quadratic differential systems which have a weak focus and invariant straight lines of total multiplicity of at least two. This family modulo the action of the affine group and time homotheties is three-dimensional and we give its bifurcation diagram with respect to a normal form, in the three-dimensional real projective space of the parameters of this form. The bifurcation diagram yields 73 phase portraits for systems in QWI plus 26 additional phase portraits with the center at its border points. Algebraic invariants are used to construct the bifurcation set. We show that all systems in QWI necessarily have their weak focus of order one and invariant straight lines of total multiplicity exactly two. The phase portraits are represented on the Poincaré disk. The bifurcation set is algebraic and all points in this set are points of bifurcation of singularities. We prove that there is no phase portrait with limit cycles in this class but that there is a total of five phase portraits with graphics, four having the invariant line as a regular orbit and one phase portrait with an infinity of graphics which are all homoclinic loops inside a heteroclinic graphic with two singularities, both at infinity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".