MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129845849 · doi:10.1142/s021812741002791x

THE GEOMETRY OF QUADRATIC POLYNOMIAL DIFFERENTIAL SYSTEMS WITH A WEAK FOCUS AND AN INVARIANT STRAIGHT LINE

2010· article· en· W2129845849 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase portraitMathematicsInvariant theoryBifurcation diagramQuadratic differentialInvariant (physics)Infinite-period bifurcationMathematical analysisPure mathematicsBifurcationQuadratic equationDiscrete mathematicsGeometryAlgebra over a fieldPhysicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planar quadratic differential systems occur in many areas of applied mathematics. Although more than a thousand papers were written on these systems, a complete understanding of this family is still missing. Classical problems, and in particular, Hilbert's 16th problem [Hilbert, 1900, 1902], are still open for this family. In this article, we conduct a global study of the class QW I of all real quadratic differential systems which have a weak focus and invariant straight lines of total multiplicity of at least two. This family modulo the action of the affine group and time homotheties is three-dimensional and we give its bifurcation diagram with respect to a normal form, in the three-dimensional real projective space of the parameters of this form. The bifurcation diagram yields 73 phase portraits for systems in QW I plus 26 additional phase portraits with the center at its border points. Algebraic invariants are used to construct the bifurcation set. We show that all systems in QW I necessarily have their weak focus of order one and invariant straight lines of total multiplicity exactly two. The phase portraits are represented on the Poincaré disk. The bifurcation set is algebraic and all points in this set are points of bifurcation of singularities. We prove that there is no phase portrait with limit cycles in this class but that there is a total of five phase portraits with graphics, four having the invariant line as a regular orbit and one phase portrait with an infinity of graphics which are all homoclinic loops inside a heteroclinic graphic with two singularities, both at infinity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it