MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129849731 · doi:10.1287/trsc.35.3.304.10148

Modeling Bus Stops in Transit Networks: A Survey and New Formulations

2001· article· en· W2129849731 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransit (satellite)Computer scienceTransport engineeringPublic transportMathematical optimizationLine (geometry)Order (exchange)Rail transitOperations researchEngineeringMathematicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we undertake a detailed study of the bus stop problem in congested transit networks. In the first part of the paper, we present and discuss the bus stop models existing in the literature. In the second part, we propose a new general model for which we prove a number of good properties and we give equivalent formulations. Then, we examine two special cases of the general model. In the first case, the line capacities are considered limited and therefore they can not be exceeded by the on-board passenger flows. In the second case, the strict capacity constraints are relaxed in order to obtain a stop model that can be easily integrated into an assignment model to predict the global passenger behavior in transit networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it