MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130148470 · doi:10.1109/icc.2006.255170

Quick Birkhoff-von Neumann Decomposition Algorithm for Agile All-Photonic Network Cores

2006· article· en· W2130148470 on OpenAlexafffund
Gregor von Bochmann, Trevor J. Hall

Bibliographic record

Venue2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Von Neumann architectureTime-division multiplexingAlgorithmCover (algebra)MultiplexingHeuristicsOverhead (engineering)Distributed computingComputer networkMathematical optimizationMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a simple and efficient algorithm for timeslot allocation in agile all-photonic network (AAPN) cores working under a time division multiplexing (TDM) mode, called the Quick Birkhoff-von Neumann Decomposition Algorithm (QBvN). The time complexity of QBvN can reach O(Nn) for a N×N switch with a TDM frame size of n. Another version of QBvN, called QBvN-cover, is also proposed to provide guaranteed scheduling with configuration overhead. For QBvN-cover, the bound of the number of generated switch configurations is provided and hence the necessary speedup for AAPN cores. Under stream-type, continuous bit rate traffic, QBvN-cover shows superior delay performance compared with other heuristics in the literature. Although QBvN-cover is unlike other BvN algorithms that use a service matrix as input, we show that service matrix construction from traffic demand is necessary for QBvN-cover to perform well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2006 IEEE International Conference on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207