MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130263634 · doi:10.1029/2011tc003033

Coupled fluid flow and sediment deformation in margin‐scale salt‐tectonic systems: 1. Development and application of simple, single‐lithology models

2012· article· en· W2130263634 on OpenAlexafffund
Sofie Gradmann, Christopher Beaumont, Steven J. Ings

Bibliographic record

VenueTectonics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersKillam TrustsCanada Research ChairsGovernment of CanadaNorthwestern University
KeywordsGeologyOverpressureLithologyCompactionPetrologyTectonicsFluid dynamicsGeotechnical engineeringPore water pressureMechanicsSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A methodology is presented to model coupled fluid flow and deformation in rifted continental margin composite salt and siliciclastic tectonic systems; and we investigate their compaction and overpressuring behavior associated with continental margin‐scale gravitational spreading. Compaction‐driven Darcy fluid flow in clastic sediments is coupled through the effective pressure to their frictional‐plastic yielding and mechanical deformation. Viscous flow of underlying salt is independent of fluid pressure. Numerical models are adapted to the Oligo‐Miocene phase of large‐scale gravitational failure in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico, and represent the first study of this system that includes dynamically evolving fluid pressure. Here we present the methodology and prototype models with single uniform sediment lithologies and simple parameterizations of their properties. The models serve to illustrate the interactions among compaction, generation of fluid overpressure, and gravitational failure and spreading. Mechanical and viscous compaction behavior of sandstone‐type and shale‐type sediments are investigated. Results demonstrate that mechanical compaction can generate moderate overpressure in thick shale‐type material, whereas high overpressure requires viscous compaction. In sandstone‐type material, only viscous compaction can generate significant overpressure, though this requires tens of millions of years. Changes in the stress regime during gravitational‐driven deformation enhance compaction and overpressure. Although illustrative of the methodology and basic processes, none of the prototype single‐lithology models satisfactorily reproduces Oligo‐Miocene fluid pressure and deformational regimes of the Gulf of Mexico. Numerical models of layered sediments together with an improved formulation of viscous compaction, presented in part 2 of this set of companion papers, are more successful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTectonicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207