MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130346454 · doi:10.1243/09596518jsce529

Hybrid sliding sector control for a wheeled mobile robot

2008· article· en· W2130346454 on OpenAlexaff
Yicheng Pan, Wencheng Wei, K. Furuta

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I Journal of Systems and Control Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Mobile robotLyapunov functionHybrid systemHolonomicControl (management)Control systemSliding mode controlControl engineeringComputer scienceRobotEngineeringNonlinear systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a hybrid control algorithm with sliding sectors for the control of a wheeled mobile robot (WMR), which is a non-holonomic system. The WMR control system with a set of available or pre-designed control laws is considered as a hybrid system with a set of subsystems. The WMR with one of control laws forms a non-linear subsystem of the hybrid system. The subsystems may be unstable but for each subsystem of the hybrid system, a stable subset called a sliding sector is designed such that a Lyapunov function candidate decreases inside the sliding sector. The hybrid control rule is used to stabilize the WMR control system by switching the hybrid system among its subsystems such that the system is always inside a sliding sector of some subsystem. The proposed hybrid sliding sector control algorithm has been successfully implemented to the real-time control of WMR with good control performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I Journal of Systems and Control EngineeringSame topicControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsFrench-language works237,207