MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The emission and vertical flux of particulate matter <10 μm from a disturbed clay‐crusted surface

2001· article· en· W2130537811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSedimentology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAeolian processes and effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticulatesFlux (metallurgy)Shear velocityAtmospheric sciencesAeolian processesHeat fluxBoundary layerGeologyGeomorphologyMechanicsHeat transferMaterials sciencePhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arid and semi‐arid environments are important sources for the atmospheric loading of PM 10 (particulate matter <10 μm), although the emission of this material is often limited by surface crusts. This study investigates the emission and vertical flux of PM 10 from a clay‐crusted playa, with and without saltating grains to abrade the surface. Using a portable field wind tunnel, it was found that, despite disturbance to the surface, the emission of PM 10 decays rapidly without abrasion. Only in the presence of saltating grains was PM 10 continuously liberated from the surface, such that the emission rate (the total amount of PM 10 emitted from the surface expressed as a horizontal flux) varied linearly with the saltation transport rate. Although the emission of PM 10 was found to depend on saltation abrasion, past studies have tended to focus on the relationship between the vertical flux of PM 10 (the amount of PM 10 being transported vertically through the boundary layer) and the shear velocity. In this study, the vertical flux of PM 10 was found to vary with the shear velocity to the power of 2·14. Although the vertical PM 10 flux is a proportion of the emission rate (the horizontal flux), no statistically significant relationship was observed between the emission rate and the shear velocity. The disparity of these results is explained by the lack of a consistent relationship between the shear velocity and the saltation transport rate in this supply‐limited environment. This suggests that the observed relationship between the vertical PM 10 flux and the shear velocity is a spurious correlation, resulting from the use of shear velocity to calculate the vertical dust flux. It is thus concluded that shear velocity is not an appropriate variable for emission modelling in supply‐limited environments and that improvements in dust emission modelling will only be realized if the abrasion process is the focus of a concerted research effort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it