MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130595048 · doi:10.1109/tns.2006.886207

Neutron-Induced Single Event Effects Testing Across a Wide Range of Energies and Facilities and Implications for Standards

2006· article· en· W2130595048 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryTRIUMF
KeywordsNeutronNuclear physicsNuclear engineeringNeutron temperatureUpsetRange (aeronautics)PhysicsFissionNeutron sourceMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutron test data on single event effects for a wide range of SRAMs, facilities (monoenergetic and continuum) and energies (thermal to 800 MeV) are compared. Many modern devices are found to be sensitive to thermal neutrons and rates from this source can dominate in many situations. A significant number of devices suffer latchup and the cross-sections increase with operating voltage and beam energy implying that most test facilities will underestimate the problem for the natural atmospheric environment. Upset sensitivity at 3-5 MeV varies from 5 to 600 less than at high energies and will be of most significance for sources of fission neutrons. These results are related to current and developing standards

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it