MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130595048 · doi:10.1109/tns.2006.886207

Neutron-Induced Single Event Effects Testing Across a Wide Range of Energies and Facilities and Implications for Standards

2006· article· en· W2130595048 on OpenAlexfundno aff
C. S. Dyer, Alex Hands, Karen A. Ford, Adam Frydland, Peter Truscott

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryTRIUMF
KeywordsNeutronNuclear physicsNuclear engineeringNeutron temperatureUpsetRange (aeronautics)PhysicsFissionNeutron sourceMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutron test data on single event effects for a wide range of SRAMs, facilities (monoenergetic and continuum) and energies (thermal to 800 MeV) are compared. Many modern devices are found to be sensitive to thermal neutrons and rates from this source can dominate in many situations. A significant number of devices suffer latchup and the cross-sections increase with operating voltage and beam energy implying that most test facilities will underestimate the problem for the natural atmospheric environment. Upset sensitivity at 3-5 MeV varies from 5 to 600 less than at high energies and will be of most significance for sources of fission neutrons. These results are related to current and developing standards

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicRadiation Effects in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207