MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130951814 · doi:10.1080/00207170601019500

Optimal filtering with random sensor delay, multiple packet dropout and uncertain observations

2006· article· en· W2130951814 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Control · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDropout (neural networks)Filtering problemNetwork packetControl theory (sociology)Norm (philosophy)Filter (signal processing)MathematicsFilter designComputer scienceMathematical optimizationAlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the problem of optimal filtering of discrete-time systems with random sensor delay, multiple packet dropout and uncertain observation. The random sensor delay, multiple packet dropout or uncertainty in observation is transformed to a stochastic parameter in the system representation. A new formulation enables us to design an optimal filter for a system with multiple packet dropout in sensor data. Based on a stochastic definition of the -norm of a system with a stochastic parameter, new relations for stochastic -norm are derived. The stochastic -norm of the estimation error is used as a criterion for the filter design. The relations derived for the new norm definition are used to obtain a set of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) to solve the filter design problems. Simulation examples show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it