MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131242765 · doi:10.1145/1064546.1180614

Implementing approximation algorithms for the single-source unsplittable flow problem

2005· article· en· W2131242765 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApproximation algorithmHeuristicsMinimum-cost flow problemAlgorithmMathematicsVertex (graph theory)Multi-commodity flow problemFlow (mathematics)Computer scienceFlow networkEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionPath (computing)Mathematical optimizationGraphCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the single-source unsplittable flow problem, commodities must be routed simultaneously from a common source vertex to certain sinks in a given graph with edge capacities. The demand of each commodity must be routed along a single path so that the total flow through any edge is at most, its capacity. This problem was introduced by Kleinberg [1996a] and generalizes several NP-complete problems. A cost value per unit of flow may also be defined for every edge. In this paper, we implement the 2-approximation algorithm of Dinitz et al. [1999] for congestion, which is the best known, and the (3, 1)-approximation algorithm of Skutella [2002] for congestion and cost, which is the best known bicriteria approximation. We experimentally study the quality of approximation achieved by the algorithms and the effect of heuristics on their performance. We also compare these algorithms against the previous best ones by Kolliopoulos and Stein [1999].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it