Non-formal Education Programmes and Poverty Reduction among Young Adults in Southern Senatorial District, Cross River State, Nigeria
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study investigated the influence of non-formal education programmes on poverty reduction among youngadults in southern senatorial district of Cross River State, Nigeria between 2000-2005. Three hypotheses werepostulated and tested. Data were collected using the Poverty Reduction Inventory (PRI). The stratified randomsampling technique was used based on location (Local Councils and existing political wards) to select four localgovernment areas and forty local wards. From these local government areas and wards, simple random samplingtechnique was employed to select two local government areas and thirty wards from which three hundred (300)youths were selected as sample for the study. Data collected were analysed using analysis of variance andindependent t-test analysis. Results obtained showed that acquisition of vocational skills lead to a significantreduction of poverty among young adults, and participants’ age on skill acquisition programmes significantly,influenced poverty reduction. Similarly, the results revealed that there is no significant difference in povertyreduction between male and female youths. On the basis of these findings recommendations were made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it