MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132082977 · doi:10.1109/radar.2008.4720784

Impact of measurement model mismatch on nonlinear Track-Before-Detect performance

2008· article· en· W2132082977 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClutterComputer scienceConstant false alarm rateRadarRayleigh distributionStationary target indicationMoving target indicationSensitivity (control systems)Rayleigh scatteringArtificial intelligenceRadar trackerRadar horizonAlgorithmRadar imagingElectronic engineeringPulse-Doppler radarEngineeringTelecommunicationsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sensitivity of track before detect processing to the choice of clutter model in the measurement correction stage was examined through processing of real and simulated data containing radar echo returns of a small maritime target in sea clutter. The potential for achieving significant detection performance improvements by utilizing K and KA distributed clutter models in place of the simpler Rayleigh distribution was demonstrated through analysis of simulated data representing spiky sea clutter. In contrast, additional analysis using real data revealed that a more accurate clutter model does not imply better performance. Specifically, significantly degraded performance is observed when K and KA based processing is used in place of a Rayleigh based processor utilizing a simple likelihood limiting step to compensate for model mismatches due to sea clutter spikes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it