MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132094409 · doi:10.1088/0268-1242/22/12/007

Optical emission from InAs/InP self-assembled quantum dots: evidence for As/P intermixing

2007· article· en· W2132094409 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Lanacer, N. Shtinkov, P. Desjardins, R. A. Masut, R. Leonelli

Bibliographic record

VenueSemiconductor Science and Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité de MontréalUniversity of OttawaRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceQuantum dotExcitonMonolayerPhotoluminescence excitationQuantum wellMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsGround stateExcitationEmission spectrumSpectral lineMolecular physicsOptoelectronicsChemistryPhysicsAtomic physicsNanotechnologyOpticsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied the optical properties of ultrathin InAs/InP quantum wells and Stranski–Krastanov nanostructures using photoluminescence and photoluminescence excitation experiments. For InAs epilayers thinner than 2.4 monolayers, the emission spectrum consists of a single peak and the ground-state exciton energy is in good agreement with predictions based on the tight-binding method for ultrathin quantum wells. Beyond this thickness, the photoluminescence spectra evolve to a multimodal emission indicative of the presence of families of quantum dots with small heights. The emission of these quantum dots is blue-shifted significantly (∼100 meV) from the predicted values. The discrepancy is explained by As/P intermixing that occurs during quantum dot formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSemiconductor Science and TechnologySame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207