MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132115546 · doi:10.1126/stke.3572006pe42

VRACs CARVe a Path for Novel Mechanisms of Communication in the CNS

2006· review· en· W2132115546 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience s STKE · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlutamate receptorHomeostasisNeurotransmitterNeuroscienceChloride channelTaurineChemistryCell biologyNeuronGlutamic acidReceptorBiochemistryBiologyAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Because the brain is encased by the skull, the ability to control cell volume in the brain is crucial, and pathological conditions that disturb cell volume homeostasis may severely compromise neural function and survival. Astrocytes are the main cell type to show swelling in response to pathological conditions. More recently, a role for swelling-induced neurotransmitter release from astrocytes under nonpathological conditions has been reported. Astrocytes express a volume-regulated anion channel (VRAC) that is involved in volume homeostasis. In addition to transporting chloride, VRACs allow the efflux of chloride and amino acids such as taurine, glutamate, and aspartate. Glutamate and aspartate are potent activators of neuronal glutamate receptors. Therefore, this nonsynaptic form of cellular communication may modulate neuronal excitability and synaptic activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.239
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it