MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132153974 · doi:10.1109/lcn.2008.4664261

Scheduling optimization in multiuser detection based MAC design for Ad-Hoc networks

2008· article· en· W2132153974 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Quality of serviceMaximum throughput schedulingComputer networkWireless ad hoc networkDistributed computingQueueing theoryRound-robin schedulingNetwork packetFair-share schedulingDynamic priority schedulingWirelessMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiuser detection based Medium Access Control (MAC) can give significant gains in throughput and Quality of Service (QoS) when applied to wireless Ad Hoc networks. To realize these gains, one has to implement a distributed neighborhood scheduling that provides the desired performance objectives. In this paper, we propose an approach for analyzing and comparing optimal or suboptimal distributed neighborhood scheduling schemes with different objectives. Then, we demonstrate the viability of this approach by implementing a scheduling scheme that uses Start Time Fair Queuing (STFQ) algorithm and by comparing its performance to a published suboptimal distributed scheduling for multiuser detection based MAC. In particular, the numerical results show that the delay performance of the priority voice packets can be significantly improved by using STFQ algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207