Modelling Tourism Destination Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Whistler, British Columbia, Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As awareness of tourism’s energy impacts on global environments increases, and as knowledge of energy consumption’s effects on tourism destination sustainability grows, so does the need for planners to develop proactive energy management strategies. However, the unique characteristics of energy consumption behaviour in resort destinations make it difficult to assess the relative merits of various energy management options. This research identifies a unique ‘bottom-up’ modelling procedure for assessing the relative effects of various destination planning strategies on energy use and GHG emissions. It then applies the model to energy management strategies being considered for implementation in Whistler, British Columbia – one of North America’s leading mountain resort destinations. The research suggests that the model’s dynamic character makes it a potentially valuable tool for quantitatively assessing what dimensions of various destination transportation, building design and community infrastructure development strategies have the greatest influence on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. The research contributes to existing destination planning and sustainable tourism development theory and practice by developing a first generation forecasting model for identifying and assessing energy use and GHG emissions, and then illustrating its practical application in the context of emerging sustainable destination planning practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it