MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132799405 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2002.804545

Design of piecewise maps for chaotic spread-spectrum communications using genetic programming

2002· article· en· W2132799405 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChaoticComputer sciencePiecewiseGenetic programmingChannel (broadcasting)Fitness functionAlgorithmPiecewise linear functionSpread spectrumGenetic algorithmMathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMachine learningTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose the use of genetic programming (GP) to design piecewise maps to generate chaotic spreading codes for direct sequence spread-spectrum communications. Using appropriate functional operators, we use GP to construct exploitable maps on the interval [0, 1]. The correlation performance of the maps is the objective function that is optimized using GP. Thus, the auto-correlation and cross-correlation performance of the maps are used as fitness measures to differentiate between potential solutions and a multi-objective GP is used to evolve maps. We are thus able to design specific maps under different number of users and show that it is better to design maps assuming large number of users as such maps work well for lower number of users. Further, in order to be able to design maps for use under different conditions of channel signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), we propose the use of the theoretical bit error rate performance of the maps as the objective function to be optimized by GP. Using this objective function, we can design maps for different conditions including channel SNR levels and number of users. We show that GP can design maps at degraded system conditions, which also work well at better system conditions. We compare the performance of the GP generated maps with other chaotic maps, as well as the traditionally used gold code through simulations. Finally, we apply GP to design maps in scenarios where mathematical design procedures cannot be applied. Using simulated channels under different channel conditions such as colored noise and multipath fading scenarios, we use GP to design maps whose performance is better than the other approaches. Thus, we show that GP can be used to design maps for different channel conditions and is therefore a promising means of solving the system design problem in communication systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it