MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132831870 · doi:10.1109/robot.2006.1642246

Underwater 3D SLAM through entropy minimization

2006· article· en· W2132831870 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of Michigan
KeywordsUnderwaterExploitArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceSimultaneous localization and mappingComputer visionRoboticsMinificationEntropy (arrow of time)Remotely operated underwater vehicleRobotGeologyMobile robotComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aquatic realm is ideal for testing autonomous robotic technology. The challenges presented in this environment are numerous due to the highly dynamic nature of the medium. Applications for underwater robotics include the autonomous inspection of coral reef, ships, pipelines, and other environmental assessment programs. In this paper we present current results in using 6DOF entropy minimization SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping) for creating dense 3D visual maps of underwater environments that are suitable for such applications. The proposed SLAM algorithm exploits dense information coming from a stereo system, and performs robust egomotion estimation and global-rectification following an optimization approach

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207