MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132831870 · doi:10.1109/robot.2006.1642246

Underwater 3D SLAM through entropy minimization

2006· article· en· W2132831870 on OpenAlexafffund
Juan Manuel Sáez, Andrew Hogue, Francisco Escolano, Michael Jenkin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of Michigan
KeywordsUnderwaterExploitArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceSimultaneous localization and mappingComputer visionRoboticsMinificationEntropy (arrow of time)Remotely operated underwater vehicleRobotGeologyMobile robotComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aquatic realm is ideal for testing autonomous robotic technology. The challenges presented in this environment are numerous due to the highly dynamic nature of the medium. Applications for underwater robotics include the autonomous inspection of coral reef, ships, pipelines, and other environmental assessment programs. In this paper we present current results in using 6DOF entropy minimization SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping) for creating dense 3D visual maps of underwater environments that are suitable for such applications. The proposed SLAM algorithm exploits dense information coming from a stereo system, and performs robust egomotion estimation and global-rectification following an optimization approach

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207