Paris revivals: two operas of Lully and Quinault
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The possibility of two Lully operas being staged in Paris within the space of a month would have seemed remote even five years ago, and certainly fanciful 20 years ago. Yet, in January, Cadmus et Hermione was mounted at the Opéra Comique and in February, Thésée at the Théâtre des Champs-Elysées, showing that these works regarded as virtually unperformable a generation ago, are now becoming established in the repertory. There have, of course, been stagings elsewhere, notably at the Boston Early Music Festival, and other occasional productions in the UK, Australia, Canada and France. Significantly, the recent Parisian presentations were not single performances but short runs of five or six performances each, and were solidly booked out well in advance. These productions have laid a few myths to rest (for example, taken at appropriate tempo, they are not as long as many have imagined) while at the same time posing some questions that must be faced if audiences are to appreciate these works as their counterparts did in the 17th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it