Epidemiological Modelling of Peer-to-Peer Viruses and Pollution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract — The popularity of peer-to-peer (P2P) networks makes them an attractive target to the creators of viruses and other malicious code. Recently a number of viruses designed specifically to spread via P2P networks have emerged. Pollution has also become increasingly prevalent as copyright holders inject multiple decoy versions in order to impede item distribution. In this paper we derive deterministic epidemiological models for the propagation of a P2P virus through a P2P network and the dissemination of pollution. We report on discrete simulations that provide some verification that the models remain sufficiently accurate despite variations in individual peer conduct to provide insight into the behaviour of the system. The paper examines the steady-state behaviour and illustrates how the models may be used to estimate in a computationally efficient manner how effective object reputation schemes will be in mitigating the impact of viruses and preventing the spread of pollution. I.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it