MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133149354 · doi:10.1109/sensorcomm.2008.12

A Multi-agent Geosimulation Approach for Sensor Web Management

2008· article· en· W2133149354 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEnvironmental Monitoring and Data Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensor webComputer scienceWireless sensor networkResource management (computing)Context (archaeology)Process (computing)Distributed computingTask (project management)Resource (disambiguation)Real-time computingSystems engineeringKey distribution in wireless sensor networksComputer networkEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sensor Webs can be thought of as distributed network systems composed of hundreds of resource constrained nodes. Sensor Webs are deployed in large scale geographic environments for in-situ sensing and data acquisition purposes. However, interpreting the collected data as well as managing the sensor Web has historically been done manually. This task has grown difficult if not impossible due to the complex functionality of modern sensor Webs. Current initiatives seek to automate the process of data interpretation and sensor Web management. In this paper, we propose a multi-agent geosimulation approach for the management of sensor Webs. Our approach is applied in the context of a water resource monitoring project. Current results show the adequacy of our approach to cop with the highly dynamic operating conditions of such an application domain and its inherent distribution of resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it