MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133294267 · doi:10.5539/mer.v2n1p81

Underwater Pile Driving Hammer with Active Impact Body

2012· article· en· W2133294267 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanical Engineering Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHammerRocket (weapon)UnderwaterPercussionExplosive materialMarine engineeringPileFalling (accident)EngineeringWater hammerMechanical engineeringAerospace engineeringStructural engineeringAcousticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider the hammer to drive the piles under water. In these hammers now used only rises mechanical percussion part and then it falls freely from some height on the drive pile.In the proposed structure of the shock it is driven in the fall on the pilot, ie it is an active percussion part. Moreover, the impact of the hammer does not move in the sealed housing and is in direct contact with the aquatic environment. This solution simplifies the construction of the hammer and makes it suitable for work in all depths. Running the percussion part - in rising and falling, is done by rocket engines. In general it can be used almost all types of rocket engines, but the authors are most appropriate electric rocket engines using for working body the overlying water. Of electric rocket engines are emerging as favorite laser because they seamlessly provide instant water heating in rocket chambers with temperatures of 4,000 to 10,000 ºC and its evaporation. Thus, the proposed hammer will have very simple structure in which only one moving part - the striking part and the supply of electrical energy will be only one wire. Here are the velocities and displacements of the four variants of the mass of the percussion part. These are the advantages of the proposed hammer to drive the piles under water - all possible depths.Consider the hammer to drive the piles under water. In these hammers now used only rises mechanical percussion part and then it falls freely from some height on the drive pile.In the proposed structure of the shock it is driven in the fall on the pilot, ie it is an active percussion part. Moreover, the impact of the hammer does not move in the sealed housing and is in direct contact with the aquatic environment. This solution simplifies the construction of the hammer and makes it suitable for work in all depths. Running the percussion part - in rising and falling, is done by rocket engines. In general it can be used almost all types of rocket engines, but the authors are most appropriate electric rocket engines using for working body the overlying water. Of electric rocket engines are emerging as favorite laser because they seamlessly provide instant water heating in rocket chambers with temperatures of 4,000 to 10,000 ºC and its evaporation. Thus, the proposed hammer will have very simple structure in which only one moving part - the striking part and the supply of electrical energy will be only one wire. Here are the velocities and displacements of the four variants of the mass of the percussion part. These are the advantages of the proposed hammer to drive the piles under water - all possible depths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it