MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133481055 · doi:10.18926/mjou/33362

The Prime Ideal Factorization of 2 in Pure Quartic Fields with Index 2

2006· article· en· W2133481055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuartic functionMathematicsIdeal (ethics)Prime idealPrime (order theory)Prime powerFactorizationField (mathematics)Algebraic number fieldAlgebraic numberCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsRing (chemistry)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prime ideal decomposition of 2 in a pure quartic field with field index 2 is determined explicitly. Let K be an algebraic number field and OK its ring of integers. When determining generators of the ideals in the prime ideal factorization of a (rational) prime p in OK, the most difficult case occurs when p divides the field index i(K) of K. In this paper we examine the case when K is a pure quartic field. Here i(K) = 1 or 2, and we determine explicit generators of the prime ideals in the decomposition of 2 when i(K) = 2. Let K be a pure quartic field. Then there exists a fourth power free integer m such that K = Q(m 1/4 ). It follows from the work of Funakura (1,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it