MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133539287 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2005.843416

Kalman Filter-Trained Recurrent Neural Equalizers for Time-Varying Channels

2005· article· en· W2133539287 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterRecurrent neural networkExtended Kalman filterComputer scienceConvergence (economics)Control theory (sociology)Equalization (audio)Channel (broadcasting)Artificial neural networkGradient descentInvariant extended Kalman filterArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have been successfully applied to communications channel equalization because of their modeling capability for nonlinear dynamic systems. Major problems of gradient-descent learning techniques commonly employed to train RNNs are slow convergence rates and long training sequences required for satisfactory performance. This paper presents decision-feedback equalizers using an RNN trained with Kalman filtering algorithms. The main features of the proposed recurrent neural equalizers, using the extended Kalman filter (EKF) and unscented Kalman filter (UKF), are fast convergence and good performance using relatively short training symbols. Experimental results for various time-varying channels are presented to evaluate the performance of the proposed approaches over a conventional recurrent neural equalizer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it