MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133729384 · doi:10.1109/rsp.2004.35

Rapid prototyping of a co-designed Java virtual machine

2004· article· en· W2133729384 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRapid System Prototyping · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of Fredericton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVirtual machineVirtual prototypingJavaEmbedded systemProcess (computing)Operating systemVirtual finite-state machineSoftwareAbstraction layerAbstractionResource (disambiguation)Software engineeringSimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Virtual machines as an execution paradigm suffer in performance due to the extra layer of abstraction that is introduced. A possible new solution to relieve the performance penalty is to utilize a co-designed virtual machine that leverages the combined benefits of hardware and software. The feasibility of such an approach is an interesting challenge due to the complex nature of a virtual machine and its resource requirements to achieve performance gains. This paper discusses the process undertaken to prototype a co-designed virtual machine so as to rapidly determine its suitability. From this prototype a complete implementation of the hardware partition is developed. Several resource requirements determined from the process are highlighted in addition to an assessment of the process used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it