MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134121628 · doi:10.1109/vtcf.2006.454

3-Dimensional Interference Modeling for Cellular Networks

2006· article· en· W2134121628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterference (communication)Time division multiple accessComputer scienceCellular networkNetwork planning and designRadio resource managementHeterogeneous networkComputer networkTelecommunicationsWireless networkChannel (broadcasting)Wireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planning and optimizing the radio access layer of cellular networks always requires an accurate modeling or measurement of the interference patterns in the network, for almost all technologies. Traditionally, this analysis has been performed using 2-dimensional traffic forecasts, and measurements or propagation predictions performed at ground level. While this applies quite well in a non-urban environment, such an approach is very limited in city centers with many high- rise buildings, where interference affects a very large proportion of traffic above the ground level. We propose a new approach based on 3D modeling of an entire city, for both traffic and propagation data. This new approach, which optimally models in-building traffic and interference in a large-scale network, has been applied to the generation of a 3D interference matrix in Manhattan. We show how this 3D interference matrix can lead to optimal frequency planning, hence improved network performance, of a real TDMA-FDMA network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it