MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134121628 · doi:10.1109/vtcf.2006.454

3-Dimensional Interference Modeling for Cellular Networks

2006· article· en· W2134121628 on OpenAlexaff
Yann Le Helloco, Jean-michel Amen, Regis Lerbour, B. Breton

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterference (communication)Time division multiple accessComputer scienceCellular networkNetwork planning and designRadio resource managementHeterogeneous networkComputer networkTelecommunicationsWireless networkChannel (broadcasting)Wireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planning and optimizing the radio access layer of cellular networks always requires an accurate modeling or measurement of the interference patterns in the network, for almost all technologies. Traditionally, this analysis has been performed using 2-dimensional traffic forecasts, and measurements or propagation predictions performed at ground level. While this applies quite well in a non-urban environment, such an approach is very limited in city centers with many high- rise buildings, where interference affects a very large proportion of traffic above the ground level. We propose a new approach based on 3D modeling of an entire city, for both traffic and propagation data. This new approach, which optimally models in-building traffic and interference in a large-scale network, has been applied to the generation of a 3D interference matrix in Manhattan. We show how this 3D interference matrix can lead to optimal frequency planning, hence improved network performance, of a real TDMA-FDMA network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Vehicular Technology ConferenceSame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207