MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134174380

Curriculum of Imperialism: Good Girl Citizens and the Makingof the Literary Educated Imagination

2005· article· en· W2134174380 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlAuntRead aloudDramatizationIdentity (music)NarrativeVisual artsSociologyPsychologyArtLiteratureHistoryAestheticsArt historyReading (process)Developmental psychologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Walter Benjamin’s understanding of the ways in which stories “live” through “re-tellings” is helpful to my thinking about how the Girl Guide and Brownie stories participated in my identity-formation because it enables me to conceptualize how The Brownie Story was a living story that came to life through dramatization. For example, the story lived in me, through me, and all around me for the majority of my formative years of my childhood. I recall that my aunt was a Brown Owl Leader. My cousins were also involved in Brownies and Guides. My aunt and cousins also read The Brownie Story. In fact, I remember that the story was often read aloud to the Brownie group. From my childhood memory, The Brownie Story went as follows:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it