MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Measuring Strain Using Optical Fibres

2000· article· en· W2134315515 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStrain · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrain gaugeTransducerOptical fiberStrain (injury)Context (archaeology)Materials sciencePrincipal (computer security)Computer scienceEngineeringComposite materialElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Optical fibres have emerged as versatile strain transducers. They can function as direct but topologically simple replacements for a range of strain gauges or can implement new measurements in distributed and integrating formats. Like all strain measurement techniques the properties of the transducer dictate its suitability for specific applications. In the case of optical fibres some of these applications are entirely new and in particular facilitate the techniques of “smart structures” fabricated from new advanced materials. This paper presents an overview of the principal approaches to optical fibre strain measurement and endeavours to set these into an applications context. In particular we shall highlight some of the more novel applications which are enabled through the use of fibre optic strain transducers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it