MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134498478 · doi:10.1109/ipdps.2002.1015486

An adaptive hash join algorithm on a network of workstations

2002· article· en· W2134498478 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceHash joinHash functionJoin (topology)WorkstationSort-merge joinAlgorithmParallel computingPentiumMD5Distributed computingQuery optimizationDatabaseOperating systemProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to advances in computer technology, many organizations have a large number of workstation-class machines connected by LAN. Such a network of workstations (NOW) can be used for parallel processing, including database query processing. This paper proposes a new load sharing algorithm for hash join processing on NOWs. This new algorithm combines a chunking method with hash join to manage dynamic changes that occur in NOW environments. The algorithm is compared with two other algorithms: an adaptive nested-loop join and adaptive GRACE hash join. These three algorithms were evaluated on a Pentium-based heterogeneous NOW system with skewed data and various non-query background loads. The results show that the new algorithm is the best among the three in most of the cases and should be used for single join processing on NOWs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207