MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134502414 · doi:10.1109/icc.2007.271

Optimal Packet Scheduling for Multi-Description Multi-Path Video Streaming Over Wireless Networks

2007· article· en· W2134502414 on OpenAlexaff
Gang Xie, M. N. S. Swamy, M.O. Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork packetVideo qualityComputer networkScheduling (production processes)Wireless networkWirelessReal-time computingPath (computing)Channel (broadcasting)Quality of serviceMultimediaAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As developments in wireless networks continue, there is an increasing expectation with regard to supporting high- quality real-time video streaming service in such networks. The recent advances in multi-description (MD) multi-path transport has made it a promising technology for content-rich wireless multimedia communications. This paper presents a rate-distortion (R-D) optimized packet scheduling algorithm (OPT- MD) for streaming MD-coded video along multiple wireless paths. Our algorithm relies on R-D hint information that is used to characterize a packet in a R-D sense. The information consists of the size of the packet in bits and the importance of the packet for reconstructing the video. Each of the video description adaptively selects certain important packets for transmission according to the quality of the transmission path by simultaneously considering bandwidth, bit error rate, and delay so that the overall end-to-end video distortion in terms of the mean square error (MSE) is minimized. Extensive simulation results demonstrate that OPT-MD can improve the quality of video streaming significantly as compared to a conventional scheduling approach that does not consider the relative importance of the video packets and the channel conditions (RANDOM-MD). The gains in performance reach up to 5 dB and 4 dB for streaming MD-coded format QCIFFORMANandTABLEvideo sequences, respectively, in the scenario of adaptation to a simulated time- varying network channel. Our efforts in this work provides an important methodology for high-quality real-time video streaming applications over wireless networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207