MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134786580 · doi:10.1144/geochem2012-174

Vertical distribution of elements in regolith over mineral deposits and implications for mapping geochemical weak anomalies in covered areas

2014· article· en· W2134786580 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegolithGeologyMineralGeochemistryMineralogyDistribution (mathematics)Earth scienceAstrobiologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several case studies are presented to demonstrate that significant migration of elements in regolith over mineral deposits can reach the earth surface through thick layers of superimposed regolith. Data obtained from drill-holes in Mo-W and Mo-Ag mineral deposits in Eastern Inner Mongolia, China using portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF, Niton XL3t 950) and data from other areas reported in the literature have been modeled using power-law decay functions that describe the regolith decay trends with increasing distance from the underlying altered rocks or saprocks. The results demonstrate that the element concentration in the surface media can be very low due to decay and mask effects, even if a thin layer of overburden exists. In order to characterize the decay behaviour of geochemical concentration of an element in a vertical regolith profile caused by complex mechanisms, a new non-linear differential equation was proposed which assumes the decay rate of concentration is negatively proportional to the concentration itself, with a functional coefficient dependent on vertical distance from the underlying surface of mineralised rocks. Applying Taylor series expansion to the coefficient function, the differential equation can be approximated by four simple dynamic systems, each with explicit solutions including Gaussian functions, exponential functions, power-law functions and exponential functions with inverse distance. These functions can be utilized as either separate or combined models to fit observed data by means of simple linear regression or multivariate regression. The combined mode is useful for evaluating the comprehensive effect of element concentration distribution due to various mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it