MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134796360 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2004.837334

Estimation and correction of beam mismatch of the precipitation Radar after an orbit boost of the tropical rainfall measuring mission Satellite

2004· article· en· W2134796360 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPrecipitation Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHokkaido UniversityJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyYork University
KeywordsBinSatelliteAntenna (radio)RadarBeam (structure)Pulse repetition frequencyAltitude (triangle)Pulse (music)Transmission (telecommunications)OpticsRemote sensingPhysicsEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceTelecommunicationsGeologyMathematicsAlgorithmDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite changed its altitude from 350 to 402.5 km in August 2001. As a result, the level-1 algorithm for the new orbit of the Precipitation Radar (PR) onboard the TRMM has to correct the "beam mismatch" resulting from the altitude change. Since the PR uses fixed transmission-reception timing, an altitude change of 50 km corresponds to a delay of return signals of 1 pulse repetition interval (PRI). This is not a serious problem if the angle bin of the next pulse is the same as the angle bin of the current pulse. Otherwise, return signals arrive at the PR when the antenna direction shifts to the next angle bin. This is called a "beam mismatch." It affects one pulse sample out of 32 averaged pulse samples. In other words, one "beam mismatch" pulse sample and 31 normal pulse samples are averaged at the onboard processor of the PR. A new algorithm was added to the PR's level-1 algorithm, 1B21, to eliminate this mismatch sample at the 402.5-km altitude. In this paper, the effect of beam mismatch is estimated for both rain echo and surface echo in terms of the received power and the incident angle dependency. The basic function of the beam mismatch correction algorithm is to estimate the received power of the mismatched pulse. Theoretically, the effective round-trip antenna pattern of a mismatched pulse has a peak right in the middle of the transmission and reception directions with a gain reduction of 6 dB. The new 1B21 algorithm uses the average of the received power of successive angle bins with a 6-dB gain reduction as the power from the mismatched pulse. The effectiveness of the correction algorithm was evaluated using high angular resolution data obtained during external calibration observations and the statistics of the normalized radar cross section of the earth's surface (/spl sigma//sup 0/), which is thought to be unchanged. The estimated error was less than 0.2 dB for the rain echo, and a large error of up to 0.5 dB was found at the boundary of the surface based on the error estimation using high angular resolution data. The difference in /spl sigma//sup 0/ and its angle dependency is explained using a simple surface model. The model results indicate the correction error reaches up to 0.8 dB at the skirts of the surface echo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it