MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134919630 · doi:10.14358/pers.72.6.653

Time-Series Analysis of Medium-Resolution, Multisensor Satellite Data for Identifying Landscape Change

2006· article· en· W2134919630 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRemote sensingGeographyCartographySeries (stratigraphy)SatelliteChange detectionTime seriesPhysical geographyComputer scienceGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The overall goal of this study is to use medium-resolution satellite imagery to determine recent changes in the landscape of the coastal zone near Sanya in the Province of Hainan, China. A search for suitable satellite imagery revealed that the only way to identify the changes was to use data from three different sensors acquired over a 12-year time period: a 1987 Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) image, a 1999 Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM� ) image, and two SPOT 2 High Resolution Visible (HRV) images acquired in 1991 and 1997. Given that the Landsat and SPOT images have different spatial resolutions and that the spectral bands cover somewhat different spectral ranges, the challenge was how to combine the images in digital format to be able to detect subtle changes in the landscape. Measures of brightness, greenness, and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were explored using standardized principal components analysis (PCA). Approximately 38 percent of the scene was occupied by water, so tests were performed with the water included and also with the water masked out to remove these low-variance pixels. Factor loadings and input-band contributions were used to interpret component images. Results show that PCA of the visible bands, representing brightness, is the superior approach for identifying new urban features in the landscape. For identification of changes to vegetation, the near-infrared (NIR) bands outperformed NDVI. Selected standardized PCA images with visible and NIR bands are recommended for identifying general changes to an urban landscape using a time-series of imagery acquired by different satellite sensors. Benefits of using a mask are believed to be dependent upon study-site characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it