MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134994421 · doi:10.1109/mper.2001.4311177

Analysis of a Static Transfer Switch with Respect to Transfer Time

2001· article· en· W2134994421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Review · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThyristorMaximum power transfer theoremCommutationTransfer (computing)Computer sciencePower (physics)Uninterruptible power supplySet (abstract data type)Time domainPoint (geometry)VoltageElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)Topology (electrical circuits)EngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thyristor-based static transfer switches (STSs) are used in uninterruptible power supply systems and in distribution networks to provide connection to alternate sources of ac power for critical loads when the main sources fail. Performance of STSs from a transfer time point of view has not been reported in the technical literature, however. This performance evaluation is a complex issue due to the dependence of the transfer time on gating scheme and commutation between thyristors. This article provides a thorough analysis of a fast gating strategy for STS systems. It derives analytical expressions to estimate the transfer time for different operating conditions and identifies the worst-case scenario(s) in which maximum transfer time occurs. The analytical results are validated based on time-domain simulation studies using the PSCAD/EMTDC package for a medium-voltage system. The simulation results are verified based on comparison with those obtained from an experimental set-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it