MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135090566 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2006.871715

Improved structured least squares for the application of unitary ESPRIT to cross arrays

2006· article· en· W2135090566 on OpenAlexaff
Maurice R. J. A. E. Kwakkernaat, Y.L.C. de Jong, J.C. Bultitude, M.H.A.J. Herben

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnitary stateAlgorithmLeast-squares function approximationMinificationRotational invarianceTotal least squaresSet (abstract data type)Unitary transformationNon-linear least squaresMathematicsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationEstimation theoryStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A key problem in high-resolution multidimensional parameter estimation via unitary ESPRIT is to jointly solve a set of invariance equations by means of least-squares minimization. It has been shown previously that existing least-squares techniques fail when applied to the category of cross arrays, which consist of perpendicular uniform linear arrays crossing at the center of the array. Cross array geometries are of special interest because they provide a larger aperture and, hence, better resolution for a given number of array elements than other multidimensional uniform array geometries. This letter proposes an improved structured least-squares method that enables successful application of unitary ESPRIT to cross arrays. Results of simulated direction-of-arrival estimation experiments using a three-dimensional cross array indicate that considerable performance improvements can be achieved if the new method is used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207