MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simplified Model for the Class-I Settling Tanks Design

2005· article· en· W2135187553 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Sediment Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSettlingEffluentSuspension (topology)CalibrationComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Process engineeringMathematicsEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringControl (management)Statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to simplify the original one-dimensional mathematical model that is used to simulate the performance of nonuniform particle sizes in Class-I settling tanks. This paper shows that the modified model is both efficient and economical. The model is capable of providing such information as removal efficiency, particle size distributions in sludge and effluent suspension, and the thickness of bottom sludge. If the desired removal efficiency is provided, a simple equation from the simplified model can be used to calculate the length of the tank. Moreover, the model is quite straightforward and does not require a computer program to obtain results. It deals with only one parameter, the sediment coefficient α, which shows great advantages. Here α is taken as 1.2 for the Class-I settling tanks, however calibration is still recommended. Effluent information, which is important for further treatment units, can be calculated directly from the simplified model. The simplified model is qualitatively reasonable in comparison with other models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it