MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135248502 · doi:10.5705/ss.2009.191

Sufficient dimension reduction in regression with missing predictors

2011· article· en· W2135248502 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistica Sinica · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSufficient dimension reductionSliced inverse regressionDimensionality reductionDimension (graph theory)MathematicsRegressionStatisticsReduction (mathematics)Missing dataRegression analysisComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceCombinatoricsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing sufficient dimension reduction methods often resort to the complete- case analysis when the predictors are subject to missingness. The complete-case analysis is inefficient even with the missing completely at random mechanism be- cause all incomplete cases are discarded. In this paper, we introduce a nonparamet- ric imputation procedure for semiparametric regressions with missing predictors. We establish the consistency of the nonparametric imputation under the missing at random mechanism that allows the missingness to depend exclusively upon the completely observed response. When the missingness depends on both the com- pletely observed predictors and the response, we propose a parametric method to impute the missing predictors. We demonstrate the estimation consistency of the parametric imputation method through several synthetic examples. Our proposals are illustrated through comprehensive simulations and a data application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it