MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135489294 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2012.2201462

Tunable Optoelectronic Oscillator Incorporating a High-Q Spectrum-Sliced Photonic Microwave Transversal Filter

2012· article· en· W2135489294 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical filterPhase noiseOptoelectronicsMicrowaveMaterials scienceOpticsCenter frequencyPhotonicsBand-pass filterPhysicsTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A tunable optoelectronic oscillator implemented employing a high-Q-factor spectrum-sliced photonic microwave transversal filter without using any electronic microwave filters is proposed and experimentally demonstrated for the first time to our knowledge. The high-Q-factor photonic microwave transversal filter is implemented using a sliced broadband optical source and a dispersive element, to perform frequency-tunable microwave frequency selection. The central frequency of the microwave filter is a function of the wavelength spacing of the sliced optical source and the chromatic dispersion of the dispersive element. Therefore, the oscillation frequency can be tuned by changing either the channel spacing of the sliced broadband optical source or the chromatic dispersion of the dispersive element. A proof-of-concept experiment is performed. An optoelectronic oscillator with a tunable frequency range of 9.7 GHz is achieved. The generated microwave signal exhibited a good phase noise performance with a phase noise of -120 dBc/Hz at an offset of 10 kHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it