MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135574948

Emergency Contraception: A Last Chance to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy

2014· article· en· W2135574948 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency contraceptionUlipristal acetateLevonorgestrelMedicineUnintended pregnancyPillFamily planningPopulationObstetricsGynecologyIntrauterine deviceCondomFamily medicineEnvironmental healthNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT. Emergency contraception provides women with a last chance to prevent unintended pregnancy after sex. In the United States, available options for emergency contraception are three kinds of pills (levonorgestrel, ulipristal acetate, and regular oral contraceptive pills in different doses) and the copper IUD. Of these, the copper IUD is by far the most effective, followed by ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel pills. After years of political struggle, levonorgestrel emergency contraceptive pills are now available without age or point-of-sale restrictions on store shelves. Although emergency contraceptive pills have not been shown to reduce unintended pregnancy or abortion rates at the population level, they are an important option for women who have experienced a failure of their regular method, have not used a method, or are sexually assaulted.Keywords: emergency contraception; levonorgestrel; copper IUD; contraception; postcoital contraception; morning-after pill1. IntroductionHalf of all pregnancies in the United States are unintended: 3.2 million occurred in 2006 alone, the last year for which data are available.1 Emergency contraception offers women a last chance to prevent pregnancy after unprotected intercourse. Emergency contraception is especially important for outreach to the 4.5 million women at risk of pregnancy but not using a regular method2 by providing a bridge to use of an ongoing contraceptive method. Although emergency contraceptives do not protect against sexually transmitted infection, they do offer reassurance to the 8.6 million women who rely on condoms for protection against pregnancy2 in case of condom slippage or breakage. Emergency contraceptives available in the United States include emergency contraceptive pills and the Copper T intrauterine device (IUD).3,4'52. Emergency Contraceptive PillsThere are three types of ECPs: combined ECPs containing both estrogen and progestin, progestin-only ECPs, and ECPs containing an antiprogestin (either mifepristone or ulipristal acetate). All three are available in the United States. Progestin-only ECPs have now largely replaced the older combined ECPs because they are more effective and cause fewer side effects. Although this therapy is commonly known as the morning-after pill, the term is misleading; ECPs may be initiated sooner than the morning after - immediately after unprotected intercourse - or later - for at least 120 hours after unprotected intercourse.Combined ECPs contain the hormones estrogen and progestin. The hormones that have been studied extensively in clinical trials of ECPs are the estrogen ethinyl estradiol and the progestin levonorgestrel or norgestrel (which contains two isomers, only one of which - levonorgestrel - is bioactive). One combined, dedicated (meaning it was specially packaged for use as EC) EC product (Preven) was approved by the FDA in 1998 but withdrawn from the market in 2004. This combination of active ingredients used in this way is also sometimes called the Yuzpe method, after the Canadian physician who first described the regimen. When dedicated ECPs are not available, certain ordinary birth control pills can be used in specified combinations as emergency contraception. In either case, the regimen is one dose followed by a second dose 12 hours later, where each dose consists of 1, 2, 4, 5, or 6 pills, depending on brand. Currently, 26 brands of combined oral contraceptives are approved in the United States for use as emergency contraception (see http://ec.princeton.edU/worldwide/default.asp#country).6 Research has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of an alternative regimen containing ethinyl estradiol and the progestin norethindrone;7 this result suggests that oral contraceptive pills containing progestins other than levonorgestrel may also be used for emergency contraception.Progestin-only ECPs contain no estrogen. Only the progestin levonorgestrel has been studied for freestanding use as an emergency contraceptive. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it