MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135621383 · doi:10.1109/tits.2010.2052805

Modeling the Stochastic Drift of a MEMS-Based Gyroscope in Gyro/Odometer/GPS Integrated Navigation

2010· article· en· W2135621383 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdometerInertial navigation systemGyroscopeKalman filterGlobal Positioning SystemInertial measurement unitControl theory (sociology)GPS/INSComputer scienceVibrating structure gyroscopeExtended Kalman filterEngineeringInertial frame of referenceAssisted GPSArtificial intelligenceAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To have a continuous navigation solution that does not suffer from interruption, GPS is integrated with relative positioning techniques such as odometry and inertial navigation. Targeting a low-cost navigation solution for land vehicles, this paper uses a reduced multisensor system consisting of one microelectromechanical-system (MEMS)-based single-axis gyroscope used together with the vehicle's odometer, and the whole system is integrated with GPS. This system provides a 2-D navigation solution, which is adequate for land vehicles. The traditional technique for this multisensor integration problem is Kalman filtering (KF). Due to the inherent errors of MEMS inertial sensors and their stochastic nature, which is difficult to model, the KF with its linearized models has limited capabilities in providing accurate positioning. Particle filtering (PF) has recently been suggested as a nonlinear filtering technique to accommodate arbitrary inertial sensor characteristics, motion dynamics, and noise distributions. An enhanced version of PF is utilized in this paper and is called the Mixture PF. Since PF can accommodate nonlinear models, this paper uses total-state nonlinear system and measurement models. In addition, sophisticated models are used to model the stochastic drift of the MEMS-based gyroscope. A nonlinear system identification technique based on parallel cascade identification (PCI) is used to model this stochastic gyroscope drift. In this paper, the performance of the PCI model is compared with that of higher order autoregressive (AR) stochastic models. Such higher order models are difficult to use with KF since the size of the dynamic matrix and the error-covariance matrix becomes very large and complicates the KF operation. The performance of the proposed 2-D navigation solution using Mixture PF with both PCI and higher order AR models is examined by road-test trajectories in a land vehicle. The two proposed combinations are compared with four other 2-D solutions: a Mixture PF with the Gauss-Markov (GM) model for the gyro drift, a Mixture PF with only white Gaussian noise (WGN) for stochastic gyro errors, and two different KF solutions with GM model for the gyro drift. The experimental results show that the two proposed solutions outperform all the compared counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it