MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135728370 · doi:10.1109/procce.1988.82241

A general purpose sequencer/controller: an alternative to ladder logic

2003· article· en· W2135728370 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Automation and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompilerMicroprocessorProgrammable logic controllerComputer sciencePID controllerController (irrigation)Programming languageControl unitProcess (computing)Computer hardwareEmbedded systemOperating systemControl engineeringEngineeringTemperature control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GESEC (generalized sequential and continuous controller) was written to transform a microprocessor-based remote-control unit into a PLC-like (programmable-controller-like) device which could be programmed by the user in a high-level, process-oriented language. The target machine for the initial project was a Taurus One/10 controller based on a Z80 microprocessor. GESEC and the GLC compiler together produced a very viable option for control involving both sequential logic and continuous analog control. It is predicted that, with improvements to the compiler, the ease with which well-documented code can be produced will be comparable to that for most of the present industrial controllers. Program structure and operation, PID (proportional, integral, derivative) control, and programming aspects are discussed, and the application of this system to a touch-up oven is discussed.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it