MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136112593 · doi:10.1109/dnsr.2004.1344728

Network intrusion detection using an improved competitive learning neural network

2004· article· en· W2136112593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntrusion detection systemComputer scienceCluster analysisArtificial neural networkCompetitive learningArtificial intelligenceComputationUnsupervised learningData miningSelf-organizing mapSet (abstract data type)Machine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Computational intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a novel approach for detecting network intrusions based on a competitive learning neural network. The performance of this approach is compared to that of the self-organizing map (SOM), which is a popular unsupervised training algorithm used in intrusion detection. While obtaining a similarly accurate detection rate as the SOM does, the proposed approach uses only one fourth of the computation time of the SOM. Furthermore, the clustering result of this method is independent of the number of the initial neurons. This approach also exhibits the ability to detect known and unknown network attacks. The experimental results obtained by applying this approach to the KDD-99 data set demonstrate that the proposed approach performs exceptionally in terms of both accuracy and computation time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207