MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136347925 · doi:10.1109/pes.2005.1489216

Hardware and software implementation of a travelling wave based protection relay

2005· article· en· W2136347925 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2005 · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)RelayComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)Fault (geology)SoftwareTransmission lineElectronic engineeringState (computer science)Power-system protectionProtective relayElectric power systemElectric power transmissionScheme (mathematics)Transmission (telecommunications)Embedded systemPower (physics)EngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fault generated transient signals can undoubtedly be employed to achieve ultra-high-speeds in transmission line protection. Even though such transient based schemes can quickly detect a faulty state on the power system, they face several challenges. Firstly, they have inherent reliability problems and secondly, it is difficult to implement them as a real-time product due to their excessive demand for high speed signal acquisition and processing. This paper examines the theoretical aspects and design procedure of a reliable, high speed protection scheme based on fault generated travelling wave information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it