A power-controlled multiple access scheme for differentiated service and energy efficiency in mobile ad hoc networks and wireless LANs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present multiple access with lag time (MALT) for medium access control (MAC) with strong quality-of-service (QoS) supports and throughput-efficient power control in mobile ad hoc networks. On lop of conventional priority-based techniques such as different interframe spaces and backoff algorithms, MAPS supports effective differentiated service employing the distributed differentiated scheduling (DDS) to allow packets with higher priority or urgent deadline to schedule for a packet slot that is farther into the future. In this way, these higher-priority packets can schedule for their transmissions without competition from lower priority packets since the latter are not allowed to make reservation during slots with conflicting schedules yet. We demonstrate through simulations that MALT is considerably stronger than IEEE 802.11e and a power-controlled dual-channel variant of IEEE 802.11e in terms of its differentiation capability for delays, discarding/blocking ratios, and throughput. Our simulation results also show that MAPS can achieve higher throughput as compared to EDCF of IEEE 802.11e due to its supports for power-controlled variable-radius transmissions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it